Back to Articles
Code Reviews that Actually Improve Code Quality (Without Slowing Teams Down)

Code Reviews that Actually Improve Code Quality (Without Slowing Teams Down)

• 4 min read

Code reviews are an essential part of modern software development, helping teams maintain code quality, catch bugs early, and share knowledge. However, when done poorly, they can slow development, frustrate developers, and create bottlenecks.

So how can engineering teams ensure that code reviews are both effective and efficient? This post explores strategies to make code reviews a seamless part of your development process while enhancing code quality and developer experience.

Why Code Reviews Matter

Effective code reviews provide multiple benefits beyond just catching bugs:

  • Improve Code Quality: Encouraging better design patterns and reducing technical debt.
  • Ensure Maintainability: Helping ensure that the codebase remains readable and understandable.
  • Enable Knowledge Sharing: Junior developers learn from experienced engineers, and team-wide best practices spread naturally.
  • Enhance Security: Identifying vulnerabilities and security risks before code goes live.
  • Prevent Production Issues: Catching bugs early reduces costly rollbacks and fixes in production.

However, if not managed properly, code reviews can introduce unnecessary delays and frustration, leading to slower deployments and demotivated developers.

Common Code Review Pitfalls

Before diving into best practices, let’s identify common issues that make code reviews inefficient:

  • Reviews Take Too Long: When PRs sit unreviewed for days, development slows down.
  • Large Pull Requests (PRs): Bigger PRs are harder to review thoroughly, increasing the likelihood of missed issues.
  • Nitpicking and Subjective Feedback: Focusing on personal preferences rather than actual code quality.
  • Lack of Clear Guidelines: Without a shared understanding of best practices, reviews become inconsistent.
  • Defensive Developers: A culture where feedback feels like criticism can create tension and hinder collaboration.

Best Practices for Effective and Efficient Code Reviews

1. Keep Pull Requests Small and Focused

  • Large PRs slow down the review process and make it harder to spot issues.
  • Aim for PRs that contain one logical change, ideally under 400 lines of code.
  • If a feature requires large changes, break it down into multiple smaller PRs.

2. Set Clear Code Review Guidelines

  • Define a shared standard for what reviewers should look for (e.g., readability, performance, security, maintainability).
  • Document expectations around coding style, best practices, and automated tooling.
  • Use linters and formatters to handle stylistic issues automatically, reducing unnecessary review comments.

3. Automate What You Can

  • Use CI/CD pipelines to enforce linting, formatting, and test coverage before human review.
  • Implement static analysis tools to catch security vulnerabilities and code smells.
  • Automate dependency checks to avoid outdated or insecure packages.

4. Encourage Constructive and Objective Feedback

  • Frame feedback in a positive and collaborative way.
  • Focus on the impact of the change rather than personal preferences.
  • Use comments like “Consider refactoring this function for better readability” instead of “This is wrong.”
  • Provide examples or suggest alternative solutions when possible.

5. Review Code Promptly

  • Delays in code reviews slow down development and lead to merge conflicts.
  • Set expectations for turnaround times (e.g., reviews should be completed within 24 hours).
  • Encourage a culture where reviewing code is a shared responsibility, not just for senior developers.

6. Use a Two-Way Learning Approach

  • Code reviews shouldn’t just be about catching mistakes but also about mentorship.
  • Encourage reviewers to explain their reasoning behind suggestions.
  • Allow junior developers to review code as well—this helps them learn and grow.

7. Avoid Unnecessary Rewrites

  • Don’t demand complete rewrites unless there’s a significant issue.
  • If code is functional and follows team standards, avoid unnecessary back-and-forth changes.
  • Recognize that there are multiple valid ways to solve a problem.

8. Leverage Pair Reviews or Live Reviews

  • If PRs are frequently getting stuck, try live code reviews via screen sharing.
  • Pair programming or synchronous reviews can be faster and more collaborative.
  • Reserve asynchronous reviews for simpler changes.

9. Foster a Positive Review Culture

  • Make code reviews a collaborative, team-building activity rather than a gatekeeping process.
  • Encourage developers to appreciate well-written code and good design choices.
  • Recognize and reward thoughtful reviews and contributions.

Conclusion

Code reviews are a crucial tool for maintaining code quality, but they should not become a bottleneck. By keeping PRs small, setting clear guidelines, automating repetitive tasks, and fostering a positive review culture, teams can ensure that code reviews are both efficient and effective.

By improving your code review process, you not only enhance code quality but also create a more engaged and productive development team.