Back to Articles
Managing Technical Debt: A Practical Approach for Engineering Leaders

Managing Technical Debt: A Practical Approach for Engineering Leaders

• 3 min read

Technical debt is an inevitable part of software development. While it allows teams to move fast in the short term, unmanaged technical debt can lead to reduced productivity, increased bugs, and longer development cycles. As a Software Engineering Manager, striking a balance between delivering features and maintaining a sustainable codebase is crucial.

In this post, we’ll explore practical strategies for identifying, managing, and paying down technical debt while keeping your team productive.

Understanding Technical Debt

Technical debt arises when teams take shortcuts to expedite feature delivery, often at the cost of code quality or long-term maintainability. It can take various forms:

  • Code Debt: Poorly written, unstructured, or duplicated code.
  • Architecture Debt: Outdated or inefficient system design.
  • Dependency Debt: Outdated libraries, frameworks, or third-party integrations.
  • Testing Debt: Lack of proper automated tests leading to fragile releases.
  • Documentation Debt: Insufficient or outdated documentation.

Why Managing Technical Debt Matters

Unchecked technical debt slows down development and increases maintenance costs. It can lead to:

  • Longer development cycles as developers struggle with outdated or inefficient code.
  • Increased bugs and outages, impacting user experience and customer trust.
  • Developer frustration due to working in an unstable or hard-to-maintain codebase.
  • Higher onboarding costs as new team members struggle to understand complex systems.

Strategies for Managing Technical Debt

1. Make Technical Debt Visible

If you don’t track technical debt, it’s easy to ignore. Use a backlog or ticketing system to log areas of concern. Label tickets with “tech debt” so they’re easy to prioritize in future sprints.

2. Prioritize Debt That Impacts Productivity

Not all technical debt needs immediate attention. Focus on the debt that slows development the most. Ask:

  • Does this debt cause frequent production issues?
  • Does it make onboarding new engineers difficult?
  • Does it increase the time needed to add new features?

3. Schedule Regular Refactoring Time

Integrate refactoring into your sprint planning. Consider:

  • Allocating a percentage of development time (e.g., 10-20%) to tech debt reduction.
  • Using “Tech Debt Fridays” where engineers tackle cleanup tasks.
  • Combining tech debt fixes with feature development to prevent regression.

4. Adopt a “Boy Scout Rule”

Encourage developers to leave the codebase better than they found it. Small, incremental improvements prevent debt from accumulating over time.

5. Set Clear Coding Standards

Prevent new debt by establishing and enforcing best practices:

  • Use code reviews to maintain quality.
  • Implement linters and automated checks.
  • Encourage modular, well-documented code.

6. Leverage Automation

Automated testing, CI/CD pipelines, and dependency monitoring tools help prevent technical debt from growing unchecked. Invest in tools that streamline maintenance.

7. Get Buy-In from Stakeholders

Non-technical stakeholders may not always understand the impact of technical debt. Use metrics to illustrate the cost of inaction:

  • Track time spent fixing bugs vs. developing new features.
  • Show how slow builds and deployments affect release velocity.
  • Demonstrate how refactoring reduces system downtime and improves stability.

8. Prevent Future Debt with Thoughtful Decision-Making

Technical debt is often a trade-off. When making quick decisions, document why a shortcut was taken and set a clear plan to revisit it. This ensures accountability and prevents hidden debt.

Conclusion

Managing technical debt is an ongoing process that requires discipline and prioritization. By making debt visible, tackling high-impact issues, integrating refactoring into development cycles, and securing buy-in from stakeholders, engineering managers can create a sustainable development environment that balances speed and quality.